Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Hyduk v. Medi-cal Benefits Id No.93095289g92307 et al
as 3:2023cv01801
Plaintiff:
Jayne Hyduk
Defendant:
Medi-cal Benefits Id No.93095289g92307, California Department Of Healthcare Services, Washington DC Department Of Healthcare Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 pi Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Kramer et al v. Avis
as 3:2019cv00421
Plaintiff:
Steve Kramer and David Kent Greenley
Defendant:
Avis Budget Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01956
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Salazar et al v. Avis Budget Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv01628
Plaintiff:
Gelasio Salazar and Saad Shammas
Defendant:
Avis Budget Group, Inc. , Cendant Car Rental Group, Inc. , Cendant Car Rental Operations Support, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alcoser v. Budget Rent a Car System, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00722
Plaintiff:
Mercedes Alcoser
Defendant:
Budget Rent a Car System, Inc., Avis Budget Group, Inc., DOES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
In Re: Tourism Assessment Fee Litigation
as 3:2008cv01796
Plaintiff:
Thomas J Comiskey, Thomas J Comiskey, Thomas J Comiskey and others
Defendant:
Avis Budget Group Inc, Avis Budget Group Inc, Vanguard Car Rental USA Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Shames et al v. Hertz Corporation et al
as 3:2007cv02174
Plaintiff:
Michael Shames and Gary Gramkow
Defendant:
Hertz Corporation, Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group, Inc., Avis Budget Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Salazar et al v. Avis Budget Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv00064
Plaintiff:
Gelasio Salazar, Gelasio Salazar, Saad Shammas and others
Defendant:
Avis Budget Group, Inc., Cendant Car Rental Group, Inc., Cendant Car Rental Operations Support, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
