Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Whitman v. CPR Classic Sales et al
as 3:2024cv01227
Defendant:
Andrea Doherty, Dylan Doherty and CPR Classic Sales
Plaintiff:
Robert B. Whitman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 oc Diversity-Other Contract
Essex et al v. County of Imperial, a Governmental Entity et al
as 3:2024cv00763
Plaintiff:
Elicia Essex and Kristina Essex
Defendant:
County of Imperial, Naphcare, Rosemary Doherty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Williams v. Doherty et al
as 3:2023cv02179
Plaintiff:
David Williams
Defendant:
Andrea Nicole Doherty doing business as California Porsche Restoration and Does 1 through 20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract
Figueroa v. Clark et al
as 3:2022cv01030
Plaintiff:
Ruben Figueroa
Defendant:
Ken Clark, Paul Silva, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Doherty v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 3:2017cv02070
Plaintiff:
Michael Doherty
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Doherty v. Citibank N.A. et al
as 3:2017cv00330
Plaintiff:
Michael Doherty
Defendant:
Citibank N.A. and Does 1 through 25
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Doherty v. Firstsource Advantage, LLC
as 3:2017cv00043
Plaintiff:
Michael Doherty
Defendant:
Firstsource Advantage, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Davis v. Prudential Insurance Company of America et al
as 3:2016cv02014
Plaintiff:
Laurel Davis
Defendant:
Prudential Insurance Company of America , Christopher Doherty and Does 1 to 30
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01608
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Doherty v. Comenity Capital Bank
as 3:2016cv01321
Plaintiff:
Michael Doherty
Defendant:
Comenity Capital Bank
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
