Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Velasco et al v. North County Transit District et al
as 3:2020cv02212
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak), Bombardier, Inc., North County Transit District and others
Cross Defendant:
ROES 1-50
Plaintiff:
Carlos Velasco and Juanita Velasco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 pi
Powers et al v. Northrop Grumman Corporation et al
as 3:2020cv01506
Plaintiff:
Douglas Miller, Jeffery Kout, ROES 1-50 and others
Defendant:
DOES 1 through 50 and Northrop Grumman Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Catlin et al v. United States of America et al
as 3:2018cv00322
Plaintiff:
Scott Catlin and DOES 1-10
Defendant:
United States of America and ROES 1-50
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00494
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Avilez et al v. Omnicare, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00409
Plaintiff:
Laura Avilez and Roes 1-50
Defendant:
Omnicare, Inc. and Does 1-50 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ibarra et al v. Manheim Investments, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00857
Plaintiff:
Jose L. Ibarra and Roes 1-50
Defendant:
Manheim Investments, Inc. , Cox Enterprises, Inc. and Does 1 through 50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Perez et al v. Princess House, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00373
Plaintiff:
Hector Daniel Perez and Karla Zarina Velasco
Defendant:
Princess House, Inc. , Glassautomatic, Inc. and Does 1-50
Cross_claimant:
Princess House, Inc. , Glass Automatic, Inc. and Anchor Hocking Specialty Glass
Cross_defendant:
Karla Zarina Velasco , Glassautomatic, Inc. , Anchor Hocking Specialty Glass and others
Counter_claimant:
Anchor Hocking Specialty Glass
Counter_defendant:
Karla Zarina Velasco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Morales et al v. GE Osmonics, Inc et al
as 3:2010cv01045
Plaintiff:
Silvia Morales and ROES 1-50
Defendant:
GE Osmonics, Inc and DOES 1-50
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
