Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Beck v. Catanzarite Law Corporation et al
as 3:2022cv01616
Plaintiff:
Justin S. Beck
Defendant:
Catanzarite Law Corporation, The State Bar of California, Ruben Duran, Esq. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Civil Remedies: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Sargent v. Southern California Edison 401(k) Savings Plan et al
as 3:2020cv01296
Defendant:
Southern California Edison Company, DOES 1-20, The Southern California Edison Benefits Committee and others
Plaintiff:
Milissa Ann Sargent
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Whitaker v. Sargent et al
as 3:2020cv00039
Defendant:
Daron Larkin, City of El Cajon, K. Harris and others
Plaintiff:
Darnell M. Whitaker, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Askin v. Global Exchange Vacation Club et al
as 3:2017cv01530
Plaintiff:
Joshua Askin
Defendant:
Global Exchange Vacation Club , Global Exchange Development Corp. , Global Vacations Marketing Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Austin-Sargent et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00799
Plaintiff:
Stacey L. Austin-Sargent and Jeffrey A. Sargent
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. , Mossy Automotive Group II, LLC , Does 1 Through 10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hupp v. San Diego County District Attorney et al
as 3:2012cv00492
Plaintiff:
Paul Hupp
Defendant:
San Diego County District Attorney, San Diego County Office of Assigned Counsel, San Diego County Superior Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hupp v. San Diego Superior Court et al
as 3:2012cv00274
Petitioner:
Paul Hupp
Respondent:
San Diego Superior Court , John Sargent Meyer , William D. Gore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hupp v. San Diego Superior Court, et al.
as 3:2011cv02909
Petitioner:
Paul Hupp
Respondent:
San Diego Superior Court , John Sargent Meyer , William D. Gore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
