Cases 1 - 10 of 60
Boutros v. Bush et al
as 3:2024cv00442
Plaintiff:
Zinia Ezzet Boutros
Defendant:
George Bush, Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pi Diversity-Personal Injury
Clinton v. Allison et al
as 3:2023cv01471
Plaintiff:
Markeith Clinton
Defendant:
Kathleen Allison, Ray Madden, R. Buckel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Clinton v. Pollard et al
as 3:2023cv00119
Plaintiff:
Markeith Clinton
Defendant:
M. Pollard, R. Buckel, S. Steadman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Ferguson v. Acutus Medical, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00388
Plaintiff:
Clinton A. Ferguson
Defendant:
Acutus Medical, Inc., Vince Burgess and David H. Roman
Thinn v. Johnson et al
as 3:2022cv00002
Petitioner:
Clinton Thinn
Respondent:
Raybon Johnson and Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Swanger v. Kijakazi
as 3:2021cv01359
Plaintiff:
Clinton Swanger
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 id
Parsa et al v. Google L.L.C. et al
as 3:2019cv02407
Defendant:
Larry Page, John Does 1-29, Sergey Brin and others
Plaintiff:
Cyrus A. Parsa, Judges, Uyghurs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Ghaderi v. Jones et al
as 3:2018cv02125
Defendant:
DOES 1 to 50, George Clinton Jones and Bastian Trucking Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mehrdad Ghaderi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 pi
Natalie Huffman et al v. Midland Credit Managment, Inc.
as 3:2017cv01015
Respondent:
Midland Credit Managment, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Natalie Huffman , Steve Huffman , Inna Borboa Badran and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Wolcott v. Clinton et al
as 3:2016cv02274
Plaintiff:
Alan W. Wolcott
Defendant:
Hillary Rodham Clinton, The Federal Bureau of Investigation , Robert Mueller and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
