Cases 61 - 70 of 168
Lowe v. Carlton et al
as 6:2019cv02225
Defendant:
Officer Troche, Federal Bureau of Prisons, "John" Carlton and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry Lowe and Jerry Kay Lowe, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cruz v. Smith et al
as 5:2019cv00576
Defendant:
A. Jones, J Smith, FNU Spearly and others
Plaintiff:
Alexander Cruz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Allah v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 5:2019cv00469
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Plaintiff:
Rateek Allah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gassew v. Federal Bureau of Prisons USP Coleman II et al
as 5:2019cv00472
Plaintiff:
John Neil Gassew and John Gassew
Defendant:
Federal Prison System, Warden, FCC Coleman, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gassew v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2019cv00227
Defendant:
Corrine Rios, Federal Bureau of Prisons, USP Coleman and others
Plaintiff:
John Neil Gassew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hinton v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 5:2019cv00169
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Plaintiff:
Henderson Lewis Hinton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hinton v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 8:2019cv00817
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Plaintiff:
Henderson Lewis Hinton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carroll v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 6:2019cv00562
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Medical Department at FCC Coleman-Medium
Plaintiff:
Daniel Carroll
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pope v. Shinn et al
as 5:2018cv00626
Defendant:
FNU Dunbar, SIS/SIA, Designations Sentence Computation Center and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Scott Pope
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lenz v. Baker County Detention Center et al
as 3:2018cv01074
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ellis Moses Lenz
Defendant:
US Federal Justice Dept., US Marshall Service, Baker County Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
