Cases 11 - 20 of 87
Gill v. United States of America et al
as 5:2023cv00109
Plaintiff:
Raymond Edward Gill
Defendant:
United States of America, Warden, FCC Coleman, Warden, USP Hazelton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Harrington v. White et al
as 8:2022cv02633
Defendant:
Brooke P. Boldin, Thomas White, Jim Kane and others
Plaintiff:
Jesse James Lee Harrington, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Getz et al v. Braden et al
as 8:2022cv02636
Plaintiff:
Lara Getz and Stephan Getz
Defendant:
Jeanne Braden, Lloyd Braden and Gill Dawg, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Partners Insight, LLC et al v. Gill et al
as 8:2022cv02098
Plaintiff:
Partners Insight, LLC and Gulf Coast Optometry, P.A.
Defendant:
Jennifer Gill, Steven Gill, Eyetastic Services, LLC and others
Partners Insight, LLC et al v. Gill et al
as 8:2022cv02100
Plaintiff:
Partners Insight, LLC and Gulf Coast Optometry, P.A. doing business as Global Care Optometry
Defendant:
Jennifer Gill, Steven Gill, Eyetastic Services, LLC and others
Slinkard v. Gill Logistics LLC et al
as 5:2022cv00292
Plaintiff:
Jess Slinkard
Defendant:
Gill Logistics, LLC, Michael Gill and Amanda Gill
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jean-Gilles v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Manatee County)
as 8:2022cv00674
Petitioner:
Excellent Jean-Gilles
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00477
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Gill v. Bayley
as 3:2022cv00137
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Gill
Defendant:
Allan Bayley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00932
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
