Cases 11 - 20 of 3,062
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe subscriber assigned IP address 173.170.84.71
as 8:2024cv01271
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe subscriber IP address 35.145.183.208
as 8:2024cv01272
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 8.30.96.97
as 8:2024cv01273
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 6:2024cv00976
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01243
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Colwell v. Schwarz et al
as 6:2024cv00905
Plaintiff:
Chad Colwell
Defendant:
LEO Matthew Schwarz, LEO John Doe 1 and LEO John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGrath v. Rice-Tanner et al
as 8:2024cv01213
Plaintiff:
Roger Lee McGrath, Sr.
Defendant:
Alex W Rice-Tanner and John Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
McGrath v. Rice-Tanner et al
as 8:2024cv01214
Plaintiff:
Roger Lee McGrath, Sr.
Defendant:
Alex W Rice-Tanner and John Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Jones v. Doe
as 8:2024cv01166
Plaintiff:
Corey M. Jones, Sr.
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sheffield v. Doe et al
as 8:2024cv01150
Plaintiff:
Lance Javon Sheffield
Defendant:
John Doe, John or Jane Doe, Sgt. Brittney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
