Cases 11 - 20 of 110
Geyer v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv00225
Plaintiff:
Phyllis J. Geyer
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Canada v. Lowell Correctional Institution
as 5:2021cv00292
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Canada
Defendant:
Lowell Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richmond-Stewart v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2021cv00549
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Phyllis E Richmond-Stewart and Phyllis E. Richmond-Stewart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Williams-Young v. Duval County Public Schools et al
as 3:2020cv01203
Defendant:
Ronald Fagan, Michelle Begley, Rosa Howell and others
Plaintiff:
Phyllis N. Williams-Young
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00680
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00977
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00841
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00837
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Gleinn et al v. Wassgren et al
as 8:2020cv01677
Plaintiff:
BRUCE R. HANNEN, MARIA CELLI, BERTRAM D. GREENBERG, as trustee for the Greenberg Family Trust and others
Defendant:
DLA PIPER LLP (US), PAUL WASSGREN and FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP
Interested Party:
Burton W. Wiand
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 - Diversity: Securities Fraud
Molina et al v. Williams et al
as 3:2020cv00785
Defendant:
Mike Williams and Roderic Dale Feacher
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Henson and Elizabeth Molina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
