Cases 21 - 30 of 5,499
Wells v. Palmer et al
as 3:2024cv00532
Plaintiff:
William Edward Wells, III
Defendant:
John Palmer, Barry Reddish, Kevin Tomlinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chery et al v. American Security Insurance Corporation
as 8:2024cv01269
Plaintiff:
William Chery and Simone Chery
Defendant:
American Security Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Property Damage (P.I.)
Linder v. Principal Life Insurance Company
as 6:2024cv00952
Plaintiff:
William Linder
Defendant:
Principal Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Kendall v. Carner et al
as 2:2024cv00433
Plaintiff:
William Kendall
Defendant:
J.P. Carner, Emily Salema, Captain Feneche and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01230
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Reeves v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 8:2024cv01227
Plaintiff:
William Morgan Reeves, III
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gaston v. City of Leesburg et al
as 5:2024cv00262
Plaintiff:
Angel E. Gaston
Defendant:
City of Leesburg, Lake County, Joseph A Iozzy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rose v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00473
Petitioner:
William Rose
Respondent:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Interested Party:
Cellular Touch Wireless, Inc.
Reeves v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Pinellas)
as 8:2024cv01199
Petitioner:
William Morgan Reeves, III
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watson v. Williams
as 3:2024cv00504
Plaintiff:
Tyson Nathaniel Watson
Defendant:
Korey Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
