Cases 21 - 30 of 46
Parks v. Corizon, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00631
Defendant:
E. Perez-Lugo, Erron Campbell, Corizon, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Parks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GAINES v. JONES et al
as 3:2018cv01332
Petitioner:
LORINE GAINES
Respondent:
Julie Jones, Corizon Health Inc and Kevin D. Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv02148
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Jackson v. Corizon Health, Inc.
as 3:2018cv01041
Defendant:
Corizon Health, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Troy Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Estate of Ronald Alexander Howard, II, Deceased, by: Cathy Pack, Personal Representative v. Holzman et al
as 3:2017cv00778
Plaintiff:
Estate of Ronald Alexander Howard, II, Deceased, by: Cathy Pack, Personal Representative
Defendant:
Martin I. Holzman, Vernon P. Montoya, Joseph Fares and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00738
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Andrews v. Scott et al
as 2:2016cv00814
Plaintiff:
Anita Andrews
Defendant:
Mike Scott, Deputy Brandon Marshall, Sergeant Robert Kizzire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrews v. Corizon Health, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00640
Plaintiff:
John A. Andrews
Defendant:
Corizon Health, Inc. and L. Colombani
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Monroe v. Charlotte County Jail et al
as 2:2015cv00729
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dale Monroe
Defendant:
Charlotte County Jail, Corizon Health Inc., Department of Financial Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saleem v. Corizon Health Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv01195
Plaintiff:
Wali Saleem
Defendant:
Corizon Health Inc., Woodrow A Myers, Jr., Stuart K. Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
