Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Lloyd v. Seagraves et al
as 3:2013cv00202
Plaintiff:
Orvel Lloyd
Defendant:
Tommy Seagraves, M. Delacruz, D. Hickox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Gerturde K. Hooper Trust et al
as 6:2012cv00376
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Hill
Defendant:
Gerturde K. Hooper Trust
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hooper v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America et al
as 5:2011cv00624
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth L. Hooper
Defendant:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America and Health Management Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Dampier v. Edwards et al
as 2:2011cv00659
Plaintiff:
Michael Lynn Dampier
Defendant:
C. Edwards, C. P. Kilgo, N. Moreno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Federal Trade Commission v. Johnson et al
as 5:2011mc00001
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
Jeremy Johnson, I Works, Inc., Cloud Nine, Inc. and others
Hooper v. United States of America
as 5:2010cv00185
Petitioner:
Edgar Hooper, III
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00549
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Great American Assurance Company v. Elliott et al
as 3:2009cv00077
Plaintiff:
Great American Assurance Company
Defendant:
Douglas Elliott, Mary Ann Hooper and William Robert Elliott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Snover v. City of Starke, Florida et al
as 3:2008cv00328
Plaintiff:
Audrey Patricia Snover
Defendant:
City of Starke, Florida, County of Bradford, Florida, Gordon Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Snover v. City of Starke, Florida et al
as 8:2008cv00571
Plaintiff:
Audrey Patricia Snover
Defendant:
City of Starke, Florida, County of Bradford, Florida, Gordon Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
