Cases 21 - 30 of 177
Peacock v. Alvarez-Sowles et al
as 8:2022cv01093
Plaintiff:
Randall Laurel Peacock
Defendant:
Nikki Alvarez-Sowles, David M. Caples, Deanna Giannini and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Colon v. Johnson et al
as 8:2022cv00888
Plaintiff:
Johana Colon
Defendant:
Kevin G. Johnson, Dale L. Hersey, Nathan S. Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Ashley v. Doe
as 3:2022cv00224
Plaintiff:
Johvany Ashley
Defendant:
John or Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peterson v. Myers et al
as 3:2022cv00090
Plaintiff:
Brett Peterson
Defendant:
Michelle Myers, H. D. DeLoach, Alexander Milligan Sharp, IV and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. Ridley et al
as 2:2021cv00863
Plaintiff:
William E. Thomas
Defendant:
Officer Ridley, J.P. Carner, Emily Salema and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Bischoff
as 8:2021cv01045
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Eric Bischoff
Plaintiff:
Robert S. Martin
3Rd Party Defendant:
John and Jane Does 1-3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kelly v. Cintas Corporation No. 2
as 8:2021cv00938
Plaintiff:
Marlon Kelly
Defendant:
Cintas Corporation No. 2 and John or Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Curtiss v. State of Florida et al
as 6:2020cv01609
Plaintiff:
Westley Curtiss
Defendant:
Unknown John and Jane Does, Paul S. West, Kyle Fletcher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bello Nogueda v. Gualtieri et al
as 8:2020cv02005
Defendant:
"Colonel Danzig", Robert Gualtieri, "Classification Specialist Widua" and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos Raul Bello Nogueda and Karla Bello
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. Connecticut General Life Insurance Company et al
as 8:2020cv01454
Defendant:
Rex M. Barbas, Ruel W. Smith, Steven D. Lehner and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
