Cases 31 - 40 of 2,521
Myers v. City of Naples, Florida
as 2:2024cv00322
Plaintiff:
Gregory B. Myers
Defendant:
City of Naples, Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00315
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Other:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Kalchbrenner v. City of Bradenton
as 8:2024cv00866
Plaintiff:
Hannah Kalchbrenner
Defendant:
City of Bradenton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cummings v. Elko et al
as 6:2024cv00649
Plaintiff:
Burton Cummings and Burton Cummings an individual doing business as Shillelagh Music Company
Defendant:
Michael Elko, City of Daytona Beach and Michael Elko an individual doing business as Elko Concerts
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Alvarez v. City of Melbourne
as 6:2024cv00634
Plaintiff:
Elena Alvarez
Defendant:
City of Melbourne
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00627
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00628
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Mahan v. Samples et al
as 3:2024cv00326
Plaintiff:
KATHY MAHAN
Defendant:
RICHARD C. SAMPLES, III, City of Jacksonville, Officer Richard C. Samples, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cole v. City of Jacksonville et al
as 3:2024cv00329
Petitioner:
Lorenzo Cole
Defendant:
City of Jacksonville, Patrick Ivey and PDF Director
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
