Cases 31 - 40 of 124
Tegtmeyer v. Hodges
as 5:2019cv00225
Defendant:
Matthew Randolph Hodges
Plaintiff:
Kevin Tegtmeyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Wimberly v. C.R. England, Inc. et al
as 8:2019cv00727
Defendant:
Randolph Gray Hall, II and C.R. England, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Gregory A. Wimberly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Randolph v. Capital One Bank (USA) N.A.
as 8:2019cv00163
Defendant:
Capital One Bank (USA) N.A.
Plaintiff:
Brian Randolph
Randolph v. Secretary Florida Department Of Corrections et al
as 3:2019cv00021
Petitioner:
Vinson Randolph
Respondent:
Florida Attorney General and Secretary Florida Department Of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
United States of America v. Real Property Located at 6741 Sorrenton Street, Orlando, FL, 32819
as 6:2018cv01803
Defendant:
Real Property Located at 6741 Sorrenton Street, Orlando, FL, 32819 and Real Property Located at 6741 Sorrento Street, Orlando, FL, 32819
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Claimant:
Scott Randolph
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 983
Blount v. Hardwood et al
as 3:2018cv01260
Defendant:
Officer Mr. Hardwood, Officer Parcher, Officer Sherman and others
Plaintiff:
Demetri Jaron Blount
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hammond et al v. Federal Insurance Company
as 3:2018cv01027
Defendant:
Federal Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Randolph Hammond and Cynthia Hammond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00827
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Peek v. Randolph
as 3:2018cv00780
Plaintiff:
David H. Peek
Defendant:
Peter D. Randolph
Counter_defendant:
Frisch Holdings, LLC and David H. Peek
Counter_claimant:
Peter D. Randolph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Hemmerle
as 6:2018cv00283
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Randolph Hemmerle
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
