Cases 41 - 50 of 322
Franklin v. DeSantis et al
as 3:2022cv00555
Plaintiff:
Joshua D. Franklin
Defendant:
Ron DeSantis, Jack Campbell, C Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Bailey et al
as 8:2022cv01145
Plaintiff:
MEGAN BAILEY
Defendant:
JAMES DALE BAILEY and GCC TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Not Classified By Court:
Gregory Holder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00344
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Clervrain et al v. Gruters et al
as 3:2021cv01209
Plaintiff:
Manetiony Clervrain, Roode A. Clervrain, Francis Osei-Fosu and others
Defendant:
Joe Gruters, Mike Arnold, Mike Beatty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bailey v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2021cv01193
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Bailey
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Knight v. Jenkins et al
as 8:2021cv02762
Defendant:
Sergeant Wagner, Sergeant Hallian, Major S. Jenkins and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Lamar Knight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. Compass Bank
as 3:2021cv01157
Plaintiff:
Willis Bailey, Jr.
Defendant:
Compass Bank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al.
as 8:2021cv02230
Petitioner:
John Bailey
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bailey v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al (Pinellas County)
as 8:2021cv02191
Petitioner:
John Bailey
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00515
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
