Cases 41 - 50 of 54
Sears v. Rivero et al
as 8:2012cv00288
Plaintiff:
Terry Eugene Sears
Defendant:
Eguardo Rivero, Tina Roberts, Vernia Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saunders v. Eslinger et al
as 6:2011cv01591
Plaintiff:
Oberist Lee Saunders
Defendant:
Donald Eslinger, Ronald Shaw, Luis Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Herman et al v. Bizar
as 8:2011cv01667
Plaintiff:
Jack Herman , Jeffrey Dee and Monkey House Games, Inc.
Defendant:
Scott Bizar
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Frank Music Corp. et al v. Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc.
as 6:2011cv00463
Plaintiff:
Frank Music Corp. and Amy-Dee Music Corp.
Defendant:
Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2010cv00522
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Happy Feet USA, Inc. v. Dees et al
as 6:2009cv02120
Plaintiff:
Happy Feet USA, Inc. and Happy Feet USA, Inc.
Defendant:
Justin Dees and Sole Source Imports, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Rogers v. Rickert
as 8:2009cv02218
Plaintiff:
Dee Rogers
Defendant:
Wayne Rickert
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Williamson et al v. Hirner et al
as 3:2009cv01067
Plaintiff:
Kenneth D. Williamson and Gloria F. Williamson
Defendant:
Dee J. Hirner, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and Government Employees Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Auto Negligence
Dees v. Hyrdradry, Inc. et al
as 8:2009cv01405
Plaintiff:
John Dees
Defendant:
Hyrdradry, Inc. and Mark Davideit
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Clark et al v. Coffee et al
as 2:2009cv00257
Plaintiff:
Noel Clark, Jr. and B. Lynn Callaway
Defendant:
Craig Coffee, Shelia Sapp, Jorge Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
