Cases 51 - 60 of 130
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00699
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Prosperous v. Todd et al
as 8:2017cv01375
Plaintiff:
Alexandra Prosperous
Defendant:
Kimberly Todd, Sherwood Coleman, James Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prosperous v. Todd et al
as 8:2017cv00996
Plaintiff:
Alexandra Love Prosperous
Defendant:
Kimberly Todd , Jack Hellinger , James Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Owens v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 3:2017cv00176
Plaintiff:
William J. Owens
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01455
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Bey v. State of Florida et al
as 3:2016cv00750
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Demond Bey
Defendant:
State of Florida, Fort Pierce Child Support & Social Service Office, Ann Coffin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Bey v. State of Florida et al
as 3:2016mc00035
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Demond Bey
Defendant:
State of Florida, Fort Pierce Child Support & Social Service Office, Ann Coffin and others
Arevalo-Mignone v. Bank of America N.A. et al
as 6:2016cv00433
Plaintiff:
Armando L. Arevalo-Mignone
Defendant:
Bank of America N.A. , Bank of America Corporation, NB Holdings Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Strode v. Ruby's Residential Care, Inc. et al
as 8:2016cv00592
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Strode
Defendant:
Ruby's Residential Care, Inc. and Anita Pierce
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Pierce v. L.A. Times-Washington Post et al
as 6:2016cv00361
Plaintiff:
Seavon Pierce
Defendant:
L.A. Times-Washington Post, U.S. News & World Report, International Herald Tribune and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
