Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Scott et al v. City of Daytona Beach Florida
as 6:2022cv02192
Plaintiff:
Dennis Scott, Chad Driggers, Douglas Willis and others
Defendant:
City of Daytona Beach Florida
Amicus Curiae:
United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Moody et al
as 3:2022cv01034
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Maxey Dell Moody, III, Richard M. Moody, Dorothy Elaina Moran and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
v. Moody et al
as 3:2022cv01033
Defendant:
Maxey Dell Moody, III, Richard M. Moody, Dorothy Elaina Moran and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
Gibson v. Rowland
as 6:2020cv01687
Defendant:
Gina Rowland
Plaintiff:
Ernest R. Gibson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gibson v. Rowland
as 6:2020cv01653
Defendant:
Gina Rowland
Plaintiff:
Ernest R. Gibson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coykendall v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2019cv02567
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Joshua Rowland Coykendall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Active Packet, LLC et al v. NetGen, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00421
Plaintiff:
Active Packet, LLC and Chad Lowe
Defendant:
the Estate of Christopher T. Rowland, Christin Rowland and NetGen, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rowland v. Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
as 3:2018cv00782
Plaintiff:
Paul Rowland
Defendant:
Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Adams v. Gilead Group, LLC et al
as 3:2016cv01566
Plaintiff:
Rowland Jeffery Adams
Defendant:
Gilead Group, LLC , Realtime Results, LLC , Diane Kopitsky and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Jamerson v. Tomoka Correctional Inst. et al
as 6:2016cv02056
Plaintiff:
Johnson Christopher Jamerson
Defendant:
Tomoka Correctional Inst., Secretary, Fla Dept of Corrections, Glenn Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
