Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00775
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Cates v. Central Garden & Pet Company et al
as 8:2023cv00379
Plaintiff:
VICKY CATES
Defendant:
CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY and KYLE HALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Shults et al v. Exam VIP, Inc. et al
as 6:2020cv00375
Defendant:
Amanda Harrison and Exam VIP, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Candice Cate and Christina Shults
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Cates v. Zeltiq Aesthetics, Inc.
as 6:2019cv01670
Plaintiff:
Terrance Nelson Cates
Defendant:
Zeltiq Aesthetics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cates v. ADB Management, LLC et al
as 8:2019cv01010
Plaintiff:
Audrey Cates
Defendant:
BDA Management, LLC, ADB Management, LLC and ADB Management, LLC doing business as Orthodontic Specialists Of Florida
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Cate Brown Photography v. David-Jacobs Publishing Group, LLC
as 8:2019cv00447
Plaintiff:
Cate Brown Photography
Defendant:
David-Jacobs Publishing Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Pratt et al v. Burns et al
as 5:2018cv00063
Plaintiff:
Earl Albert Pratt, Jr. and Michaal Cates
Defendant:
Levi Burns and Lisa Dorrier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cates et al v. Federal Insurance Company
as 3:2018cv00137
Plaintiff:
Christopher Cates and Joy Cates
Defendant:
Federal Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cates v. BDA Management , LLC
as 8:2017cv02359
Plaintiff:
Audrey Cates
Defendant:
BDA Management , LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Cates-Aquino et al v. Santander Consumer USA, Inc.
as 5:2017cv00098
Plaintiff:
Sherryl Cates-Aquino and Luis Aquino
Defendant:
Santander Consumer USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
