Cases 1 - 10 of 2,109
Williams v. Charles Schwab Co.
as 8:2024cv01336
Plaintiff:
DeAndre Williams
Defendant:
Charles Schwab Co.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wandell v. Buck et al
as 8:2024cv01288
Plaintiff:
Keith L. Wandell
Defendant:
Benjamin Waldo Buck and Thomas Charles Fielding
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Odonoghue v. Gufford
as 2:2024cv00479
Plaintiff:
Wycliffe H. Odonoghue
Defendant:
Charles P. Gufford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (DO NOT USE)
Chism v. Long et al
as 8:2024cv01231
Plaintiff:
Wilbert Chism
Defendant:
Janet C. Long, Brian Scott, Charles Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Earwood v. Phillips
as 6:2024cv00900
Plaintiff:
Charles Earwood
Defendant:
Bryce Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States Fire Insurance Company v. Phillippe et al
as 6:2024cv00912
Plaintiff:
United States Fire Insurance Company
Defendant:
Cyndie A. Phillippe and Charles A. Phillippe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Earwood v. 18th Judicial Circuit et al
as 3:2024cv00479
Plaintiff:
Charles Earwood
Defendant:
18th Judicial Circuit and 5th District of Appeal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels et al v. Farmers Casualty Insurance Company Exchange
as 8:2024cv01124
Plaintiff:
ZORA & CHARLES DANIELS
Defendant:
Farmers Casualty Insurance Company Exchange
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 0635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Charles v. Fox et al
as 2:2024cv00413
Plaintiff:
Whitney J. Charles
Defendant:
Amira D. Fox, Bill Prummell, Patrick Mulvaney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
