Cases 21 - 30 of 984
JONES v. SOLITARY WATCH et al
as 4:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
JESSIE W JONES
Defendant:
SOLITARY WATCH, DONALD J TRUMP, JOHN KIRBY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MATHEWS v. HUGE et al
as 3:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
CARLTON XAVIER MATHEWS
Defendant:
HUGE, LUSK and J M LAMBERT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITE v. MITCHELL et al
as 5:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
RODNEY J WHITE
Defendant:
MITCHELL and JOSEPH STREET
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. KING et al
as 4:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
JESSIE W JONES and JESSIE WIMSY JONES
Defendant:
JOSHEPH J BIDEN, WAKULLA ANNEX CORRECTION INSTITUTION SHIFT SUPERVISOR, SGT DICKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MATHEWS v. DIXON et al
as 3:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
CARLTON XAVIER MATHEWS
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON, DONALD LEAVINS and J STREEIT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE J WILLIAMS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MATHEWS v. STREEIT et al
as 3:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
CARLTON XAVIER MATHEWS
Defendant:
J STREEIT and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GOMEZ v. KEY et al
as 5:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
MAXIMO GOMEZ
Defendant:
DANIELLE MARIE KEY, CHRISOTPHER HELMS, J HATCHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RINKINS v. SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 4:2024cv00056
Petitioner:
MICHAEL J RINKINS
Respondent:
SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JETT v. SMITH et al
as 5:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
EARNEST JETT and EARNEST JETT, JR
Defendant:
J SMITH, CHRIS FEILDER, RYISNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
