Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Cases 31 - 40 of 14,108
MURZIKE v. ELLIS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00197
Defendant: JAMES T. MURZIKE, D ELLIS, T THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WESLEY v. PAYNE et al
as 5:2024cv00086
Plaintiff: JAMES ALLEN WESLEY, JR
Defendant: S PAYNE and C WALKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURZIKE v. QUINN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00196
Plaintiff: JAMES T. MURZIKE
Defendant: R QUINN, W GIELOW, J SANTIAGO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CUMMINGS v. CRUNK et al
as 4:2024cv00194
Plaintiff: HORACE BENJAMIN CUMMINGS
Defendant: WILLIAM CRUNK, KASEY M PAYNTER, JAMES R RYAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCWILLIAMS v. MURPHY
as 5:2024cv00084
Plaintiff: MAURICE MCWILLIAMS
Defendant: P MURPHY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CURRY v. USA
as 4:2024cv00197
Petitioner: JOSHUA CURRY
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
RUMPH v. DIXON
as 4:2024cv00191
Petitioner: TAVARES RUMPH
Respondent: RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DAVIS v. FRANKLIN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION et al
as 4:2024cv00190
Plaintiff: LLOYD ANTHONY DAVIS
Defendant: FRANKLIN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, REGION 1 PHARMACY and FNU PAWKK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BIVENS v. SZCZECINA
as 4:2024cv00185
Petitioner: JEROME E BIVENS
Respondent: M SZCZECINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HOWARD v. BROTON
as 4:2024cv00187
Petitioner: KIRK H0WARD
Respondent: JENNIFER A BROTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?