Other Civil Rights Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Cases 31 - 40 of 3,127
POLLOCK v. GARLAND
as 4:2024cv00158
Plaintiff: DANIC POLLOCK
Defendant: MERRICK B GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
HALE v. HALE et al
as 4:2024cv00156
Plaintiff: RODRICK HALE
Defendant: RENEE HALE, TERRENCE HALE, TERRY MITHELL, SR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MCKENZIE v. JUDICIAL QUALIFICATION COMMISSION
as 5:2024cv00070
Plaintiff: TABITHA MCKENZIE
Defendant: JUDICIAL QUALIFICATION COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JONES v. UNITED STATES
as 1:2024cv00054
Plaintiff: CHARLES ANTHONY JONES
Defendant: UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
TORTORIELLO et al v. GAGLIARDI We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00020
Plaintiff: MARGARET TORTORIELLO and JOSEPH TORTORIELLO
Defendant: ROSEMARY GAGLIARDI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TAYLOR v. RHODES
as 5:2024cv00027
Plaintiff: CARL TAYLOR, JR
Defendant: TERRY L RHODES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WALTERS v. TALLAHASSEE POLICE DEPARTMENT
as 4:2024cv00085
Plaintiff: ADRIAN WALTERS and ADRIAN WALTER
Defendant: TALLAHASSEE POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FOY v. FLORIDA COMMISSION ON OFFENDER REVIEW et al
as 4:2024cv00140
Plaintiff: TEENA FOY
Defendant: FLORIDA COMMISSION ON OFFENDER REVIEW and MELINDA N COONROD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SIMS v. CITY OF TALLAHASSEE
as 4:2024cv00035
Plaintiff: STANLEY SIMS
Defendant: THE CITY OF TALLAHASSEE and CITY OF TALLAHASSEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JACKSON v. FOLEY CELLULOSE LLC
as 4:2024cv00052
Plaintiff: CAMERON JACKSON
Defendant: GEORGIA-PACIFIC LLC and FOLEY CELLULOSE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?