Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Cases 71 - 80 of 14,108
CHANDLER v. RALPH et al
as 3:2024cv00176
Plaintiff: CALVIN ANTHONY CHANDLER
Defendant: A RALPH and C CASWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WAMBLES v. BROWN
as 3:2024cv00173
Plaintiff: JAMIE WAMBLES
Defendant: J BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VELAZQUEZ v. WILSON
as 3:2024cv00175
Plaintiff: EMMANUEL VELAZQUEZ
Defendant: MICHAEL WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ENGLISH v. DIXON
as 5:2024cv00048
Petitioner: CORDARREL ENGLISH
Respondent: RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WRIGHT v. DEAN
as 4:2024cv00108
Plaintiff: ROBERT LEE WRIGHT, III
Defendant: URSULA DEAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MONTGOMERY v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 3:2024cv00084
Plaintiff: JOHN W MONTGOMERY
Defendant: STATE OF FLORIDA and SECRETARY FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MATHEWS v. STREEIT et al
as 3:2024cv00167
Plaintiff: CARLTON XAVIER MATHEWS
Defendant: J STREEIT and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. KING et al
as 4:2024cv00030
Plaintiff: JESSIE W JONES and JESSIE WIMSY JONES
Defendant: JOSHEPH J BIDEN, WAKULLA ANNEX CORRECTION INSTITUTION SHIFT SUPERVISOR, SGT DICKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRIESTER v. HARRIS et al
as 3:2024cv00168
Plaintiff: DAVID PRIESTER, JAMES THOMAS and DAVID JACKSON
Defendant: SCOTT S HARRIS, GRANT MALOY, EUGENE GRINBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KELLY v. SIMMONS et al
as 3:2024cv00102
Plaintiff: TERRENCE KELLY
Defendant: CHIP W SIMMONS, M HOUSAM and RAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?