Cases 1 - 10 of 14,160
MALONE v. DIXON
as 1:2024cv00097
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY GENE MALONE
Respondent:
RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LE BOSS v. DIXON
as 1:2024cv00098
Petitioner:
RYAN TODD LE BOSS
Respondent:
RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CULMER v. FLORIDA STATE HOSPITAL PSYCHOLOGY DEPARTMENT et al
as 4:2024cv00247
Plaintiff:
ANTOINE ALPHEUS CULMER
Defendant:
FLORIDA STATE HOSPITAL PSYCHOLOGY DEPARTMENT, HEATHER BURLAS and AMICARELLI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRYANT v. SWAIN et al
as 1:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN WALLACE BRYANT
Defendant:
SWAIN, KENNEDY, WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HORN v. WELLS et al
as 3:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
LUTHER ARTHUR HORN, III
Defendant:
KEVIN WELLS, BILL EDDINS, TERRY TERRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. DIXON
as 3:2024cv00259
Petitioner:
Derick Levell Jones
Respondent:
Secretary, FDC Ricky D. Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ARMAS v. SECRETARY FLORIDA DEPARMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2024cv00091
Petitioner:
NELSON ARIEL ARMAS
Respondent:
SECRETARY FLORIDA DEPARMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
VANDERFORD v. DIXON et al
as 4:2024cv00243
Plaintiff:
PERRY GENE VANDERFORD
Defendant:
RICKY D DIXON, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICES IRS and INMATE TRUST FUND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUIZ v. ALDRIDGE
as 3:2024cv00260
Plaintiff:
JULIO RODRIGUEZ RUIZ
Defendant:
BEAU ANTHONY ALDRIDGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WATSON v. BUTLER
as 3:2024cv00261
Plaintiff:
TYSON N WATSON
Defendant:
R BUTLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
