Cases 101 - 110 of 429,501
MARTINEZ v. LESLIE et al
as 3:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
DIEGO C. MARTINEZ
Defendant:
ZAKARY LESLIE and FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRICE v. PAUL
as 5:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
ROBERT STEVEN PRICE
Defendant:
JOE PAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
NKANSAH et al v. NKANSAH-MAHANEY et al
as 4:2024cv00211
Plaintiff:
Victoria Nkansah and Jivan Nkansah
Defendant:
Nancy Nkansah-Mahaney and Jeffrey Nkansah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
PRUETT v. THE CITY OF PENSACOLA FLORIDA
as 3:2024cv00223
Plaintiff:
HOLLI PRUETT
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PENSACOLA, FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
WHITE v. CSL CREEKSIDE FL LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00230
Plaintiff:
TANYA WHITE
Defendant:
CSL CREEKSIDE FL, LLC d/b/a THE WATERFORD AT CREEKSIDE and SONIDA SENIOR LIVING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
TRISTAR PRODUCTS INC v. TELEBRANDS CORPORATION et al
as 1:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
TRISTAR PRODUCTS INC
Defendant:
TELEBRANDS CORPORATION, WHELE, LLC D/B/A PERCH AND JEFFREY L. SNOW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
MCLEOD v. ESCAMBIA COUNTY FLORIDA
as 3:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
AUSTI MCLEOD
Defendant:
ESCAMBIA COUNTY FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
COPELAND v. FREEDOM BOAT CLUB LLC
as 3:2024cv00225
Plaintiff:
Jordan Copeland
Defendant:
Freedom Boat Club, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
HOGAN v. DIXON
as 3:2024cv00229
Petitioner:
TIYARI R HOGAN
Respondent:
RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
