Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Cases 121 - 130 of 429,544
MURZIKE v. SPEARS et al
as 3:2024cv00228
Plaintiff: JAMES T MURZIKE
Defendant: S SPEARS, GODDARD, MCMATH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GALINDEZ v. LOPEZ-RIVERA et al
as 5:2024cv00100
Plaintiff: RALPH GALINDEZ
Defendant: LUIS A LOPEZ-RIVERA, M FREHN and D MADDOX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HYDE v. FLORIDA DIVISION OF CORPORATIONS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00226
Plaintiff: TRISTAN MICHAEL HYDE
Defendant: FLORIDA DIVISION OF CORPORATIONS and ANGELA LILES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRUETT v. THE CITY OF PENSACOLA FLORIDA
as 3:2024cv00223
Plaintiff: HOLLI PRUETT
Defendant: THE CITY OF PENSACOLA, FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
MCLEOD v. ESCAMBIA COUNTY FLORIDA
as 3:2024cv00224
Plaintiff: AUSTI MCLEOD
Defendant: ESCAMBIA COUNTY FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
IBRIHIM v. LANGLEY
as 1:2024cv00081
Petitioner: SIRAJ IBRIHIM
Respondent: J LANGLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HILL et al v. AMERICAN SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY
as 4:2024cv00222
Plaintiff: Juanita Hill and Tyson Hill
Defendant: American Security Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
RASHADA v. HATHCOCK et al
as 3:2024cv00219
Plaintiff: JADEN RASHADA
Defendant: HUGH HATHCOCK, WILLIAM NAPIER, MARCUS CASTRO-WALKER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
WALKER v. PATE
as 5:2024cv00099
Plaintiff: AMOS WALKER
Defendant: PATE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALKER v. DIXON et al
as 4:2024cv00221
Plaintiff: JESSE ALAN WALKER
Defendant: RICKY DIXON, JAMES COKER, TIMOTHY NOLES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?