Cases 151 - 160 of 429,991
MOULTRIE v. GIELOW
as 3:2024cv00389
Defendant:
W GIELOW
Plaintiff:
EDDIE JAMES MOULTRIE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHEARRY v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2024cv00141
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Petitioner:
SATORRE TRAMAINE WHEARRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LOPEZ v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 4:2024cv00337
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA and STATE OF FLORIDA
Petitioner:
OSCAR CASTANEDA LOPEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JOHNSON v. ZAYAS et al
as 1:2024cv00142
Defendant:
FNU ROBERT, FNU GAMBLE, B ZAYAS and others
Plaintiff:
STEPFONE L JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HALL et al v. DAVIS et al
as 4:2024cv00336
Plaintiff:
TONNIE NEALY, CURTIS DALE, JR and WENDELL HALL
Defendant:
MELANIE MERCADO, SHEVAUN DAVIS and RAVEN REID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KINNER v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 3:2024cv00384
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff:
TIMMY KINNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS LLC v. DOE
as 4:2024cv00335
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Plaintiff:
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS LLC v. DOE
as 4:2024cv00334
Plaintiff:
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS LLC
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
SAPP v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 4:2024cv00332
Plaintiff:
ANDREW A SAPP
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA and DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
