Cases 11 - 20 of 4,898
SYMONETTE v. DENEEN
as 4:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
MAURICE SYMONETTE
Defendant:
ANDREW DENEEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MITCHELL v. LAVORADO et al
as 3:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
JAMES JONATHAN MITCHELL
Defendant:
M LAVORADO, DAIQUIRI DUNCAN, LOPEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDREWS v. DIXON et al
as 5:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
JOHN ANDREWS
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON and WARDEN OF APALACHEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDREWS v. PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES,LLC
as 3:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
PAUL ANDREWS
Defendant:
PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
NUNEZ v. DAVID et al
as 3:2023cv24725
Plaintiff:
ANDREW NUNEZ
Defendant:
J DAVID, B JONES and J HOLLIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GISWICK v. GARCIA et al
as 4:2023cv00449
Plaintiff:
ANDREW MICHAEL GISWICK
Defendant:
JESUS GARCIA and HUNTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTINEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv34691
Plaintiff:
ANDREW MARTINEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SILVER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv34795
Plaintiff:
ANDREW SILVER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DE LEON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv34706
Plaintiff:
ANDREW DE LEON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GLATZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv34974
Plaintiff:
ANDREW GLATZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
