Cases 11 - 20 of 99
MELLOTT v. FORT WALTON POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 3:2022cv23005
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HOWARD MELLOTT
Defendant:
FORT WALTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, OKALOOSA COUNTY FLORIDA PROSECUTION OFFICE and CITY OF FORT WALTON BEACH FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EMRIT v. FORT LAUDERDALE POLICE DEPARMENT et al
as 1:2022cv00281
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant:
FORT LAUDERDALE POLICE DEPARMENT and CUSTODIAN OF RECORDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
FORTE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv17381
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ROBERT FORTE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv16682
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
FORTES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv15238
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL FORTES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
FLINK v. CITY OF FORT WALTON BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 3:2022cv08087
Plaintiff:
Jacob Flink
Defendant:
CITY OF FORT WALTON BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT, PRESTON R WEST, Robert Bage and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Forte v. LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
as 3:2022cv06570
Plaintiff:
ROSEMARY FORTE
Defendant:
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
FORTE v. LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
as 1:2022cv00112
Plaintiff:
ROSEMARY FORTE
Defendant:
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CLAYBORNE v. FORT WALTON BEACH MEDICAL CENTER et al
as 3:2022cv00557
Plaintiff:
TYRONE CLAYBORNE
Defendant:
FORT WALTON BEACH MEDICAL CENTER, SUNSHINE MEDICAL and PATTEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
