Cases 21 - 30 of 55
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00393
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00392
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
TRIBBLE v. MEDICAL DIRECTOR et al
as 1:2019cv00133
Defendant:
MEDICAL DIRECTOR, SUPERVISOR OF GRIEVANCE SYSTEM, JPAY REPRESENTATIVE and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT A TRIBBLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DESPART v. DCF et al
as 4:2019cv00287
Defendant:
DCF, FCCC DIRECTOR and DONALD SAWYER
Plaintiff:
THOMAS DESPART
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARKES v. INCH
as 3:2019cv01089
Plaintiff:
DEVONTE PARKES
Defendant:
REGIONAL DIRECTOR
Respondent:
MARK S INCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PARKES v. REGIONAL DIRECTOR
as 3:2019cv00786
Plaintiff:
DEVON PARKES
Defendant:
REGIONAL DIRECTOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCHMIDT v. OCDOC DIRECTOR
as 3:2019cv00551
Defendant:
OCDOC DIRECTOR, CORIZON HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS, LARRY ASHLEY and others
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK JAMES SCHMIDT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LONG v. DARNELL et al
as 1:2019cv00010
Defendant:
SADIE DARNELL and FOOD SERVICE DIRECTOR
Plaintiff:
JESSIE LONG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HELBIG v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 4:2018cv00547
Petitioner:
SUSANNE D HELBIG
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ATTORNEY GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Defendant:
DIRECTOR EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW, WARDEN FCI TALLAHASSEE, DIRECTOR FEDERAL BUREAU OF IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOM ENFORCEMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HRIOUCH v. NIELSEN et al
as 4:2018cv00539
Defendant:
District Director KATHERINE BARANOWSKI, Director L FRANCIS CISSNA, Field Office Directo Kimberly Dean and others
Plaintiff:
Badrane Hriouch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
