Cases 21 - 30 of 525
HOBBS v. CITY OF PANAMA CITY BEACH et al
as 5:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
OLANDIS DEAN HOBBS
Defendant:
CITY OF PANAMA CITY BEACH, PANAMA CITY BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT, JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MATHEWS v. STREEIT et al
as 3:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
CARLTON XAVIER MATHEWS
Defendant:
J STREEIT and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JAMBULINGHAM v. DEFENDANT 1 et al
as 3:2024cv00116
Defendant:
DEFENDANT 1, DEFENDANT 2, AMEAD and others
Plaintiff:
HEMANTHKUMAR JAMBULINGHAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
CHRISTOPHE v. SASSER et al
as 3:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHE ILMART and ILMART CHRISTOPHE
Defendant:
DR SASSER and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SALEM v. DEFENDANT 1 et al
as 3:2024cv00093
Defendant:
Defendant 1, Anna Asfahany and JOHN DOES 1-20
Plaintiff:
Nabil Dweib Salem
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS LLC v. DOE
as 1:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS LLC
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS LLC v. DOE
as 1:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS LLC
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
PEGASUS LABORATORIES INC v. ESTONCE INC, et al
as 3:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Pegasus Laboratories, Inc. dba PRN Pharmacal and PEGASUS LABORATORIES INC doing business as PRN PHARMACAL
Defendant:
ESTONCE, INC., a California corporation, RICARDO PONCE, ESTONCE INC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
BUSBY v. JOHNSON
as 3:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
JEREMY BUSBY
Defendant:
BOB JOHNSON, JOHN DOE 1 and JOHN DOE 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS LLC v. DOE
as 1:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS LLC
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
