Cases 31 - 40 of 430
REAGAN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv07865
Plaintiff:
LISA REAGAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HILLIARD v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv06625
Plaintiff:
LISA HILLIARD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DOE et al v. LADAPO et al
as 4:2023cv00114
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE, SUSAN DOE, Brenda Boe and others
Defendant:
Joseph A. Ladapo, FLORIDA BOARD OF MEDICINE, Scot Ackerman and others
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS, ACADEMIC PEDIATRIC ASSOCIATION, American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NEWMAN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv06598
Plaintiff:
LISA MARIE NEWMAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
VOTE.ORG et al v. BYRD et al
as 4:2023cv00111
Plaintiff:
VOTE.ORG, FLORIDA ALLIANCE FOR RETIRED AMERICANS and FLORIDA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP
Defendant:
CORD BYRD, KIM BARTON, CHRISTOPHER MILTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STEPHENSON v. REDD
as 1:2023cv00020
Plaintiff:
LISA STEPHENSON
Defendant:
SAMUEL D REDD
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 183 Limitation of Liability
POHLMANN v. NOLES et al
as 4:2023cv00019
Plaintiff:
KENNETH MARK POHLMANN
Defendant:
LISA NOLES, MRS A HILL, S BEARDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BATTLE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv00295
Plaintiff:
LISA BATTLE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BAILEY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv00020
Plaintiff:
LISA MARIE BAILEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DRUMMOND v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv25165
Plaintiff:
LISA DRUMMOND
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
