Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Cases 31 - 40 of 49
MINNIS v. FINK et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2017cv00168
Plaintiff: BOBBY MINNIS
Defendant: A L FINK, OSBORNE, DELOACHE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DICKERSON v. MOCK et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2016cv00113
Plaintiff: WILLIE DICKERSON, JR
Defendant: A R MOCK , C A MURPHY , G HENDRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHEFFIELD v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 4:2015cv00568
Plaintiff: LANCE JAVON SHEFFIELD
Defendant: FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, TINNEY, REHKOP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHEFFIELD v. SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 4:2015cv00553
Plaintiff: LANCE SHEFFIELD
Defendant: SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, REED, MOCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GLONER v. MOCK et al
as 4:2015cv00522
Plaintiff: MICHAEL EDWARD GLONER
Defendant: MIKE MOCK and CANDICE HENRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GLONER v. MOCK et al
as 5:2015cv00262
Plaintiff: MICHAEL EDWARD GLONER
Defendant: MIKE MOCK and CANDICE HENRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
NASHADDAI v. JOHNSON et al
as 4:2015cv00448
Plaintiff: NYDEED NASHADDAI
Defendant: A L JOHNSON, TERRY L WHITLOCK, UNKNOWN OFFICER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCBRIDE v. ADAMS et al
as 4:2015cv00422
Plaintiff: ANTHONY D MCBRIDE
Defendant: ADAMS, ALLEN, COLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. JONES et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00175
Plaintiff: NATHANIEL J BROWN
Defendant: JULIE JONES, REID, H GARTMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOORE v. MOCK et al
as 4:2015cv00205
Plaintiff: KATIE NICOLE MOORE
Defendant: MIKE MOCK, JODY MARTINA and TIMMY WALLACE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?