Cases 31 - 40 of 429,416
CHAMBERS v. NICOLAS et al
as 3:2024cv00212
Plaintiff:
KEION NATHANIEL CHAMBERS
Defendant:
C NICOLAS and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BATTISTA v. RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 3:2024cv00209
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Battista
Defendant:
RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
NORTHPOINTE RETIREMENT COMMUNITY INC v. INDEPENDENT SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
as 3:2024cv00213
Plaintiff:
NORTHPOINTE RETIREMENT COMMUNITY INC
Defendant:
INDEPENDENT SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
KIRKLAND v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Mr. Michael Kirkand
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
LIBERTY MUTUAL PERSONAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. LEE et al
as 5:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
LIBERTY MUTUAL PERSONAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
CHONG CHUN LEE and LAGOON PONTOONS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
KAMAU v. SLATE
as 4:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
DIOP KAMAU
Defendant:
GREGORY A SLATE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MOORE v. CITY OF FORT WALTON BEACH
as 3:2024cv00208
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY WAYNE MOORE
Defendant:
CITY OF FORT WALTON BEACH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CADEJUSTE v. DIXON et al
as 4:2024cv00208
Plaintiff:
MARCO THONY CADEJUSTE
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON, Z CULPEPPER and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WIREMAN v. WAKULLA COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE et al
as 4:2024cv00209
Plaintiff:
ERIC ALLEN WIREMAN
Defendant:
WAKULLA COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE and GENESYS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MITCHELL v. WEST et al
as 3:2024cv00210
Plaintiff:
BRANDYN MITCHELL
Defendant:
J WEST and M NEAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
