Cases 41 - 50 of 88
LEWIS v. SCOTT
as 4:2016cv00715
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN LEWIS
Defendant:
RICK SCOTT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
COOPER v. SCOTT et al
as 4:2016cv00558
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY L COOPER
Defendant:
RICK SCOTT, HEATHER JAUDZIMAS and MARGRETTE MORGAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHEELY v. JONES et al
as 3:2016cv00573
Plaintiff:
CURTIS SHEELY
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS SECRETARY, JIMMY COKER, BOOKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COOPER v. SCOTT et al
as 4:2016cv00611
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY L COOPER
Defendant:
RICK SCOTT and MARGRETTE MORGAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. JONES et al
as 4:2016cv00598
Plaintiff:
KEVIN JOHNSON
Defendant:
JULIE L JONES, PAMELA JO BONDI and RICK SCOTT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OSTERBACK v. SCOTT et al
as 4:2016cv00105
Plaintiff:
MARK OSTERBACK
Defendant:
RICK SCOTT and CELESTE PHILIP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PORTER v. SCOTT et al
as 4:2015cv00485
Plaintiff:
FONTAINE LEROY PORTER
Defendant:
RICK SCOTT, DONIE LEE and RICK RAMSEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. FLORIDA BAR
as 4:2015cv00273
Plaintiff:
COWELL NEMOY BROWN
Defendant:
FLORIDA BAR, 5TH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL, BOB WATTLES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v PENSACOLA POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 3:2015cv00231
Plaintiff:
JOHN JERMAINE JACKSON
Defendant:
PENSACOLA POLICE DEPARTMENT, RICK SCOTT and RODGERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCOTT et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 3:2015cv00193
Plaintiff:
RICK SCOTT , STATE OF FLORIDA and AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES , CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES , ANDY SLAVITT and others
Amicu:
GREG ABBOTT , SAM BROWNBACK , LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF FLORIDA and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
