Cases 41 - 50 of 1,318
DUBOISE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2023cv00210
Plaintiff:
Lynisha Duboise
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364 Auto Negligence
FABOZZI et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2023cv10474
Plaintiff:
Wayne Fabozzi and Wendy Fabozzi
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. HUMBERT
as 3:2023cv10226
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ROSE HUMBERT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of Debt to US
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. LILES
as 5:2023cv00131
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CAMEO LILES and CAMEO LILES-JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of Debt to US
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. TROY
as 1:2023cv00114
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DENNIS TROY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of Debt to US
SPICER v. GABBY
as 4:2023cv00195
Petitioner:
Sunny Spicer
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and GABBY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
GARDNER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2023cv10077
Petitioner:
MERRILL CLARK GARDNER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
OWENS et al., v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv00109
Plaintiff:
Lashonda Owens and NYLA OWENS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
JONES v. GRAINGER
as 4:2023cv00151
Plaintiff:
RAY JONES
Defendant:
GRAINGER, STATE OF MICHIGAN, WAYNE COUNTY JURY COMMISION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARGUELLES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2023cv08090
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER N ARGUELLES, AMBER RAELYNN ARGUELLES and CHRISTOPHER M ARGUELLES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
