Cases 41 - 50 of 12,149
WILLIAMS v. HAGER et al
as 1:2023cv00287
Plaintiff:
TONY WILLIAMS
Defendant:
JOLYNN HAGER and DOCTOR PHYSICIAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. DIXON et al
as 3:2023cv24731
Plaintiff:
RICHARD WILLIAMS
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON, DEBRA PERRY, T BOWDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. TAT et al
as 1:2023cv00286
Plaintiff:
PERCIVAL WILLIAMS
Defendant:
SARA TAT, STATE OF FLORIDA, WILLIAM E DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. CRETE CARRIER CORPORATION et al
as 1:2023cv00279
Plaintiff:
BOBBY JOE WILLIAMS, JR
Defendant:
CRETE CARRIER CORPORATION and PABLO DIAZ FERRAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
HINES v. JONES et al
as 4:2023cv00509
Plaintiff:
Robert Hines
Defendant:
Valerie Jones, Christopher Dille, Tyler Wimberly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PETERS v. TRISTAR PRODUCTS INC
as 3:2023cv24679
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM E PETERS
Defendant:
TRISTAR PRODUCTS INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPLAINT OF WILLIAM SCHWED
as 5:2023cv00327
Petitioner:
William Schwed
Claimant:
David W Burnette
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv24672
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
BRADLEY v. WILLIAMS et al
as 3:2023cv24728
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL WILLIAM BRADLEY
Defendant:
JOYCE WILLIAMS, JENNIFER FRYDRYCHOWICZ, BRUCE MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MOSELEY v. BAY COUNTY CODE ENFORCEMENT et al
as 5:2023cv00291
Plaintiff:
ADAM LEE MOSELEY
Defendant:
BAY COUNTY CODE ENFORCEMENT, BAY COUNTY FLORIDA, SCOTT MICHEAL THORPE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
