Cases 51 - 60 of 525
MCREYNOLDS v. LYLES et al
as 1:2023cv00212
Plaintiff:
BLAKE AUSTIN MCREYNOLDS
Defendant:
CORRECTIONS OFFICER J LYLES, SERGEANT D COURTOT, NURSE JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BLAKE v. SAMMIS et al
as 3:2023cv21819
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LEONOUR BLAKE
Defendant:
SAMMIS, M LOWE, CATNOCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBINSON v. DOE et al
as 4:2023cv00352
Plaintiff:
DUSHUN D ROBINSON
Defendant:
HILL, JANE OR JOHN DOE and JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FRAZIER v. APPLE HOSPITALITY REIT INC et al
as 4:2023cv00349
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN FRAZIER
Defendant:
APPLE HOSPITALITY REIT INC and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
FLORIDA FIRE CHIEFS' ASSOCIATION INC v. TRUIST BANK
as 1:2023cv00203
Plaintiff:
FLORIDA FIRE CHIEFS' ASSOCIATION INC
Defendant:
TRUIST BANK and JOHN DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
CARR v. TATE et al
as 5:2023cv00206
Plaintiff:
JOHN MICAH CARR
Defendant:
JOHN TATE, CITY of BONIFAY, ROGER YOUNG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LEE v. DIVA NAILS et al
as 5:2023cv00204
Plaintiff:
ISAAC ALFONSO LEE
Defendant:
DIVA NAILS, JOHN DOE, I, JOHN DOE, II and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
DOE v. GLASS
as 4:2023cv00321
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
MARK GLASS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
COLLINS v. DESANTIS et al
as 4:2023cv00281
Plaintiff:
AVERY V COLLINS
Defendant:
RON DESANTIS, RICKY DIXON and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EZELL v. BROWN et al
as 3:2023cv16487
Plaintiff:
ROB ERIC EZELL
Defendant:
BROWN, THE GEO GROUP, TWO UNKNOWN GEO PRISON GUARDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
