Cases 61 - 70 of 429,417
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
WALLESKE v. CHILDS et al
as 4:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE WALLESKE
Defendant:
LARRY CHILDS, RONTERRIOUS WILLIAMS, JOHN DOES 1-3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
REAGAN v. BEST BUY CO, INC
as 4:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
BOBBI REAGAN
Defendant:
BEST BUY CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
COULTER v. BERRY, DUNN, MCNEIL, & PARKER LLC
as 4:2024cv00201
Plaintiff:
Emily Coulter
Defendant:
Berry, Dunn, McNeil & Parker, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
MATHES et al v. ALL SOUTH ELECTRICAL CONSTRUCTORS INC
as 3:2024cv00205
Plaintiff:
Johnny Mathes and Carrie Mathes
Defendant:
All South Electrical Constructors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
EANES-GILLILAN et al et al v. GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY
as 3:2024cv00204
Plaintiff:
Maria Eanes-Gillian and Carl Eanes-Gillian
Defendant:
GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
BELILLA v. PLANTE et al
as 4:2024cv00202
Plaintiff:
VICTOR BELILLA
Defendant:
WILLIAM PLANTE and NATALIA AZIZE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00204
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
