Cases 1 - 10 of 12,147
RASHADA v. HATHCOCK et al
as 3:2024cv00219
Plaintiff:
JADEN RASHADA
Defendant:
HUGH HATHCOCK, WILLIAM NAPIER, MARCUS CASTRO-WALKER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
SCOTT v. WEEKS
as 3:2024cv00218
Plaintiff:
JOHN WILLIAM SCOTT
Defendant:
NOLAN WEEKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALLESKE v. CHILDS et al
as 4:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE WALLESKE
Defendant:
LARRY CHILDS, RONTERRIOUS WILLIAMS, JOHN DOES 1-3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BELILLA v. PLANTE et al
as 4:2024cv00202
Plaintiff:
VICTOR BELILLA
Defendant:
WILLIAM PLANTE and NATALIA AZIZE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WILLIAMS v. ALACHUA COUNTY JAIL STAFF AND ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
TAVEROUS WILLIAMS
Defendant:
ALACHUA COUNTY JAIL STAFF AND ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
CUMMINGS v. CRUNK et al
as 4:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
HORACE BENJAMIN CUMMINGS
Defendant:
WILLIAM CRUNK, KASEY M PAYNTER, JAMES R RYAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GUTHRIE v. MCCALLUM et al
as 1:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE GUTHRIE
Defendant:
BOBBY MCCALLUM, GERARD WILLIAMS and SAM QUINCEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BOGGS v. DAVIS et al
as 4:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
HARRY LEE BOGGS, JR
Defendant:
DAVIS, BRICE GOOGLE, D WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. MILLER et al
as 4:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
MARIO M THOMAS
Defendant:
JAMES WILLIAM MILLER, SHAWN SWAIN and DAWN A HART
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DANIELS v. TAYLOR CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE et al
as 4:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH DARRELL DANIELS
Defendant:
TAYLOR CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE, JULIE JONES, WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
