Cases 1 - 10 of 5,003
ALLEN v. SUTTON et al
as 3:2024cv00252
Plaintiff:
SHER'MON A ALLEN
Defendant:
ADAM SUTTON, R QUINN, CHARLES RICKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOULLARD v. QUINN et al
as 3:2024cv00253
Plaintiff:
RANDY L WOULLARD
Defendant:
R QUINN, CHARLES RICKS, DONALD LEAVINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COLLIER v. COLLIER
as 1:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
IRINA COLLIER
Defendant:
CHARLES WADE COLLIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
COLLIER v. FL BOARD OF EDUCATION BOARD OF GOVERNOR et al
as 1:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
IRINA COLLIER
Defendant:
FL BOARD OF EDUCATION BOARD OF GOVERNOR, CHARLES WADE COLLIER and D TRUMP
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
DAWSON v. DIXON
as 5:2024cv00107
Petitioner:
CHARLES DAWSON
Respondent:
RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WOULLARD v. JACOBSEN et al
as 3:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
RANDY L WOULLARD
Defendant:
K JACOBSEN, R F CALDWELL, CHARLES RICKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COLVIN v. SECRETARY FDOC
as 3:2024cv00142
Petitioner:
CHARLES COLVIN, JR
Respondent:
SECRETARY FDOC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JONES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ANTHONY JONES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
SOUTHERN-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY v. PELICAN CIRCLE ASSOCIATION INC et al
as 3:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
Southern-Owners Insurance Company
Defendant:
Pelican Circle Association, Inc., Alex Marks, Charles Harmon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
