Cases 1 - 10 of 21
THOMAS v. PRISON HEALTH SERVICES INC et al.
as 3:2015cv00223
Plaintiff:
DEVANDAL BERNARD THOMAS
Defendant:
PRISON HEALTH SERVICES INC, MARSHA NICHOLS, JULIE JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BELL v. MARHALIC
as 4:2011cv00119
Plaintiff:
CEDRIC BELL
Defendant:
MAURICE MARHALIC, ROSS, MATTHEWS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEE v. ALACHUA COUNTY et al
as 1:2011cv00027
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH FRANK LEE
Defendant:
ALACHUA COUNTY, ALACHUA COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, SADIE DARNELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SORROWS v. CAMPBELL et al
as 4:2011cv00059
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM SORROWS
Defendant:
LARRY CAMPBELL , OKALOOSA COUNTY FLORIDA and PRISON HEALTH SERVICES INC
Counter_claimant:
LARRY CAMPBELL
Counter_defendant:
WILLIAM SORROWS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ZELLERS v. FLORIDA PRISON HEALTH SERVICES
as 4:2010cv00340
Plaintiff:
BRENT A ZELLERS
Defendant:
FLORIDA PRISON HEALTH SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GORDON v. MCNEIL, et al
as 4:2010cv00111
Plaintiff:
ETHAN ROBERT GORDON
Defendant:
WALTER MCNEIL, DUGGARS, PRISON HEALTH SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROLLE v. PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, et al.,
as 4:2009cv00033
Plaintiff:
AARON ROLLE
Defendant:
PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, LEON COUNTY JAIL, TONYA RAINEY and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
COPELAND v. PRISON HEALTH SERVICES INC
as 3:2008cv00553
Plaintiff:
LATONYA COPELAND
Defendant:
PRISON HEALTH SERVICES INC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
PORCHER v. DARNELL, et al
as 1:2008cv00238
Plaintiff:
ALLEN D PORCHER
Defendant:
SADIE DARNELL, PRISON HEALTH SERVICES and ARMARK FOOD
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv00330
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
