Cases 1 - 10 of 6,953
THOMAS v. LEON COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE et al
as 4:2024cv00380
Defendant:
TALLAHASSEE FLORIDA STATE ATTORNEY OFFICE, LEON COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE, DARRELL FOWLER and others
Plaintiff:
MARCIA THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FAULLS v. DAVIS et al
as 5:2024cv00205
Defendant:
B BIRD, GABBY, A T DAVIS and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS FAULLS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. MANAGEMENT & TRAINING CORPORATION et al
as 5:2024cv00209
Defendant:
SCOTT MIDDLEBROOKS, SNELL, L GAINER and others
Plaintiff:
DEONSEY LONTE JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FIPPS v. THOMAS
as 5:2024cv00139
Defendant:
ANTONIO LEON THOMAS
Plaintiff:
MARDELL FIPPS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHAMBLISS v. BAGGETT
as 5:2024cv00140
Defendant:
HAYES BAGGETT
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY THOMAS CHAMBLISS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HORN v. WELLS et al
as 3:2024cv00296
Defendant:
JEFFREY E LEWIS, W LAPORTE, KELVIN WELLS and others
Plaintiff:
LUTHER ARTHUR HORN, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. DIXON
as 4:2024cv00317
Petitioner:
ALEXANDER F THOMAS
Respondent:
RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00313
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
THOMAS v. KAISER et al
as 3:2024cv00359
Defendant:
DEFUNIAK SPRINGS POLICE DEPARTMENT, JAMES W HURLEY, JR, ANTHONY KAISER and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN WAYNE THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RITCHIE v. VORTEX SPRING ADVENTURES LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00108
Defendant:
DARYL R DOCKERY and VORTEX SPRING ADVENTURES LLC
Plaintiff:
THOMAS G RITCHIE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
