Cases 31 - 40 of 146
Ortiz v. Peterson et al
as 1:2022cv20605
Plaintiff:
Carlos Luis Ortiz
Defendant:
Keith Peterson and Amanda Peterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Peterson v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 1:2022cv20738
Plaintiff:
Damon Peterson
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morris et al v. Ganz et al
as 9:2021cv82044
Plaintiff:
Scott A. Morris, Brenda M. Morris, Philippa Oates and others
Defendant:
Ernie Ganz and Lennie Ganz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peterson v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 2:2021cv14398
Plaintiff:
Ernest Kennedy Peterson
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Peterson v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 2:2021cv14368
Plaintiff:
Israel Laverne Peterson
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mitchell et al v. Walmart Stores East, LP et al
as 2:2021cv14359
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Mitchell and Dewayne Mitchell
Defendant:
Walmart Stores East, LP and Derrick Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gilberti v. Cruz et al
as 0:2021cv61777
Plaintiff:
Joseph D. Gilberti, Jr.
Defendant:
Nicholas Cruz, 72 Partners LLC., Christopher Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Gilberti v. Cruz et al
as 0:2021cv61705
Plaintiff:
Joseph D. Gilberti, Jr.
Defendant:
Nicholas Cruz, 72 Partners LLC., Christopher Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fontus-Charles v. Wal-Mart Stores East LP et al
as 9:2021cv80926
Plaintiff:
Sherline Fontus-Charles
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East LP and Derrick Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Barberi v. THE MAIL CENTER OF FORT LAUDERDALE LLC et al
as 0:2021cv60508
Defendant:
Verna M. Peterson, THE MAIL CENTER OF FORT LAUDERDALE LLC and Peggy J. Peterson
Plaintiff:
Renzo Barberi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
