Cases 41 - 49 of 49
Young v. U.S. Probation Office
as 9:2011cv80020
Plaintiff:
Edwin W Young, Jr.
Defendant:
U.S. Probation Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Garland v. Caban et al
as 0:2009cv61324
Plaintiff:
Anthony D Garland
Defendant:
Madeline Caban, Brian M Garek, Court of Probate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Creek v. Marion County Mental Health Dept. et al
as 0:2009cv60657
Plaintiff:
Ronnie W. Creek
Defendant:
Marion County Mental Health Dept., Broward County Mental Health Division, Broward County Probation Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Carreras et al v. United States Probation
as 9:2009cv80603
Plaintiff:
Anthony W. Carreras and Robin Edmonds
Defendant:
United States Probation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Johnson v. State of Florida et al
as 1:2008cv22864
Plaintiff:
Willie Johnson
Defendant:
State of Florida and Parole and Probations Dept.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Molten v. Rathman et al
as 1:2008cv22579
Petitioner:
Michael Molten
Respondent:
John T. Rathman, Federal Detention Center - Miami, Robert MacCarone and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Alcenat v. United States Attorney's Office et al
as 1:2007cv23319
Plaintiff:
Michelet Alcenat
Defendant:
United States Attorney's Office and Probation Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Chavvary v. United States Probation Department
as 1:2007cv22045
Plaintiff:
Rafael Chavvary, Jr.
Defendant:
United States Probation Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Doe v. United States Probation Office et al
as 1:2007cv20123
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
United States Probation Office, Jeffery Feldman and Miami-Dade Corrections & Rehabilitation Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
