Cases 41 - 50 of 451
Leep v. Moose International, Inc. et al
as 9:2023cv80709
Plaintiff:
Toni Leep
Defendant:
Moose International, Inc. and West Palm Beach Lodge No. 1461, Loyal Order of Moose
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Nepton v. Tony
as 0:2023cv60984
Plaintiff:
Javier Isaac Nepton
Defendant:
Sheriff Gregory Tony
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Tony
as 0:2023cv60693
Plaintiff:
Zavier Jamal Harris
Defendant:
Greorey Tony and Sheriff Gregory Tony
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv60591
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Berlongieri v. Daniel et al
as 0:2023cv60867
Defendant:
Mr. Joshua Berlongieri and Tony L Daniel
Plaintiff:
Joshua Berlongieri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Wood v. Tony et al
as 1:2023cv21838
Plaintiff:
Keith Eric Wood
Defendant:
Gregory Tony and Barbara Duffy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Papageorge v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 2:2023cv14068
Plaintiff:
Tony Alexander Papageorge, Jr.
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Conte Jail Facility et al
as 0:2023cv60820
Plaintiff:
Salinas Falun Smith
Defendant:
Conte Jail Facility, Salinas A. Smith, Salinas G. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Cheng et al
as 1:2023cv21652
Plaintiff:
Salinas Falun Smith
Defendant:
Dr. Angela Cheng and Tony Fernando Mathias
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Cross v. Johnson et al
as 0:2023cv60393
Plaintiff:
Mr. Demetrius Cross
Defendant:
Jermaine Johnson and Sheriff Gregory Tony
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
