Cases 41 - 50 of 77
Barksdale v. Trump et al
as 9:2019cv81722
Defendant:
Donald Trump and U.S. Homeland Security Department
Plaintiff:
James Barksdale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barksdale v. Bush et al
as 9:2019cv81274
Defendant:
Donald Trump, George Bush, U.S. Homeland Security Department and others
Plaintiff:
James Barksdale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CASEY v. TRUMP et al
as 2:2019cv14178
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
BRIAN M. CASEY
Defendant:
DONALD TRUMP and United States Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Joshua v. United States Of America et al
as 1:2019cv20348
Defendant:
Instagram, Holliness Temple Church International "Holiness Temple", Facebook, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
King Joshua
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Waugh v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2019cv20038
Defendant:
Rick Scott, Seller, Chaplain Bascom Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Waugh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marcellus v. United States of America et al
as 1:2019cv20064
Defendant:
US Courts, Ray Raymond, State of Florida and others
Plaintiff:
Dom Marcellus and Marcelo Meirelles de Carvalho
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv25444
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Morton v. Trump et al
as 1:2018cv25230
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Nathan Morton
Defendant:
Vice President Pence and President Donald Trump
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Copeland v. Jones et al
as 1:2018cv24940
Plaintiff:
Shannon Copeland
Defendant:
Director Christopher Wray, U.S. Attorney General, Katherine Fernandez-Rundle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fusco v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
as 1:2018cv24916
Defendant:
Walter Woods, Donald Trump, United States of America and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Fusco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
