Civil Rights Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Cases 1 - 10 of 3,684
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00185
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00089
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00183
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
CAVORETTO v. CHAPMAN et al
as 3:2024cv00049
Plaintiff: KRISTILEE CAVORETTO
Defendant: JOE CHAPMAN, MELISSIA RUSK and WALTON COUNTY GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00086
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USSERY v. HOUSTON COUNTY GEORGIA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2024cv00116
Plaintiff: DONALD J USSERY, JR
Defendant: HOUSTON COUNTY GEORGIA and MARK DANIEL HEBERLIG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2024cv00033
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
BRYSON v. PENFIELD ADDICTION MINISTRIES INC et al
as 3:2024cv00028
Plaintiff: IVAN BRYSON
Defendant: PENFIELD ADDICTION MINISTRIES INC, CRYSTAL PAGE, MIKE WALKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PALM v. CORRCARE INC et al
as 3:2024cv00047
Plaintiff: GREGORY PALM
Defendant: CORRCARE INC, DR PAUL BUCZYNSKY, JONES COUNTY GEORGIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00082
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?